To be genetically illiterate in the genomic age

To be genetically illiterate in the genomic age

Facebook
Twitter

What if I told you that the source code, or genomes, for many living organisms is available for free online? Would it surprise you? As of today, all genomes created by public funds are accessible to anyone in the world. Anyone with internet access, and a little bit of curiosity, can access tomes of genetic information at a click of a finger. However, while these genomes remain open to the  public for anyone to download, the information that makes these resources valuable and interesting remain behind paywalls. But before we dive into the issues of accessibility, it's worth reflecting on just how quickly this type of genomic data increased. Just take a look at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), which houses a huge amount of genomic data from diverse species.

This the full nucleotide sequence of the human parechovirus virus. It's a nasty little virus that is found in both rodents and humans, and causes gastrointestinal and respiratory issues (fun!). In this small list of nucleotide sequences lies the key to how this virus triggers an immune response in humans and makes us sick. Its entire genome lies on the internet for anyone to access – but, this virus isn’t unique. Rather it's a small drop in the ocean of genomes we have sequenced. Image credit: Pablo Mendieta. Image source 

To date, NCBI has sequence data for over almost 50,000 genomes belonging to diverse organisms, pretty much from alligators to zebras. Considering that the first Eukaryotic genome, budding yeast was published in 1996, this amounts to about five new genome being sequenced, and published every single day. The fathers of science fiction – Asminov, Huxley, Welles – couldn't have predicted such a radical shift in speed and accessibility in scientific information. However, it's important to realize that while these resources are accessible to anyone, the tools to understand these complex by products of billions of years of evolution remain guarded by the old establishments of scientific journals.  

For instance, let's say you're interested in the baboon genome, which you can find after a Google search and a few clicks around. You might be interested in what those authors found in their initial study, as well as ask the question “Why even sequence the baboon genome?” (a good question), or “What did the authors find?” (another good question!). However, once you click on the link to the publication the authors, you're greeted with an unpleasant reality. Those answers cost money.

Screen Shot 2020-02-17 at 7.15.22 PM
The payment options you’re provided on the landing page of a Nature journal article.

If you're unaware, most scientific journals require one of the following: 1) a subscription costing $200 a year, 2) institutional access, or 3) purchasing an individual article for the price of $80. Any of these three avenues is greatly restrictive to the average scientifically curious person, making that baboon article more than likely not worth the price. So, what is someone to do with the wealth of genomic data available to the public, when any insights gleaned from it aren't? 

It's worth mentioning this isn't a new issue. In the last few decades the idea of “open access science”, or free access to scientific journals, has been discussed in great detail. With publications like the New York Times posting stories about scientists sick of the closed nature of science. It's gotten so dire that some scientists took it upon themselves to pirate all known scientific journals and make them accessible to anyone in the world in the form of a piratebay-like site called sci-hub. The scientific journal establishment has taken the creation of this website seriously, and has charged the creator of sci-hub, Alexandra Elbakyan with a record fine of some four million dollars in damages.

And yet, the process of publishing and restricting science continues.  The result is on par with an illiterate person gaining access to a library. While wondrous in its own right, what good is it for someone who cannot read? Resources created with public tax dollars that are accessible to all, and yet the understanding and scientific stories remain hidden in what can only be envisioned as the scientific equivalent of a dragon’s horde. It raises an interesting  question: what value do these genomes really have if the knowledge accompanying them isn't accessible? Is there any value in them at all?  

For further reading of the current war of scientific journals and open access, check out this excellent Verge piece.

 

About the Author

Pablo Mendieta is a graduate student pursuing a PhD in bioinformatics and genomics at the University of Georgia. His specific interest lie at the intersection of agriculture, and genetic technologies. From Boulder Colorado, he enjoys the outdoors, science fiction, programming, and hip hop. You can email him at john.mendieta@uga.edu or connect with him on Twitter. More from Pablo Mendieta.

 

Featured image credit: Anna Marchenkova via Wikimedia Commons licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

 

About the Author

Website | + posts

More to explore

Scroll to Top